I almost took life for
I'm took to class for true
and the uncharted frontiers of spirituality. Join us as we explore the wonders of our world
and beyond, all while embracing the roles of curious bystanders rather than experts. Together
we'll unravel the tapestry of existence, blending the dichotomies of knowledge and wonder. Get
ready to question, ponder, and delve into the dualities that shape our understanding of reality
on Duality Check. I'm Drew. I'm Dean. And welcome to episode 99.5. 99 and a half. And
yeah, sorry for missing the last update, but we had recorded a sibling podcast. Yeah. Well,
we thought we recorded a sibling podcast. We did get the video. We got the video and we
got the music track, but none of the vocal tracks. Yeah, unfortunately. But yeah, we're going
to do that again. So this is kind of our in between. We wanted that to be our hundredth
episode. Yeah. So maybe we'll do a little mini episode today. Just talk about a couple of
things. Yeah, because a lot's gone on in the last few months or a month or so, I guess.
So, so far still no like big overall no alien invasion or anything that we know of. Yeah.
No, it's not like a rival. uh Yeah, it's not like there was some crazy thing about to happen
on the very day Chris Bledsoe predicted. So yeah, we're well past Easter now. So unless
we're going back to the end of the year timeline or the next year, either way. The one thing
I wanted to doubt, I didn't even think to look at until now, was whether the star of Regulus
rose in the eye of the Sphinx on that day. You know, that's a good point. anybody got a picture
of it or something. Maybe we'll some digging on a break. Yeah, you would think someone
would be... I feel like we would have seen it too. Yeah. Just because our algorithms are
probably... Cool. Well... Yeah, we got a few things to share with you all and talk about.
uh yeah. So we actually got a comment. He said, good subjects. You guys were probably
burning some quality stuff before the show. Love the stash. Great show, fellas. Keep it
up. Nice. This is oath. oh Oath of or something like that. Oath of F. Yeah. Cool. Thanks, man.
Appreciate it. Appreciate it. um Cool. So did you share this? Maybe. I think I did. Yeah.
Okay. I remember seeing this. I saw him and a couple other people talking about this other
Sphinx discovery. There's other people too. Yeah. But I haven't dug into it. I haven't
actually watched it yet. I wanted to watch it together. Okay. This is a 14 minutes. Jay
Anderson. uh Project Unity. Project Unity on X. says, breaking new Giza Plateau scans
locate second Sphinx. Could a giant mount of compacted sand in the Giza Plateau be hiding
the legendary second great sphinx of Giza? The new SAR slash Doppler scans from the Khafre
pyramid project suggest this could be the exact location. All right, let's check this out.
Professor Filippo Bionde, a satellite radar specialist with a background in radar with
the Italian government, sat down with Matt Beale and stated that he had found a second Great
Sphinx on Giza buried beneath a 180-foot mound of compacted sand on the plateau. Horizontal
passageways extending from deeper underground sections both show shafts that are descending
down to depth, they both show horizontal tunnel systems extending outward, and they both show
the same geometric internal arrangement.
So what I was told quietly in Malta when I was with Filippo Bionde and the rest of the Capra
pyramid team has now been disclosed on Matt Beale's Limitless podcast, which I was also
on recently. Links for that are in the description box. But this time it was my friend, Professor
Filippo Bionde on the podcast. And he sent the internet into a frenzy over recent scans pointing
towards what could be a second Sphinx on the Giza Plateau. Professor Filippo Bionde, a satellite
radar specialist with a background in radar with the Italian government, sat down with
Matt Beale and stated that he had found a second great sphinx on Giza buried beneath a 180-foot
mound of compacted sand on the plateau and that the geometric precision of its alignment with
the known sphinx and the pyramid of Caffray was, in his exact words, 100%. Here's what
makes the story genuinely extraordinary. The idea of a second sphinx is not new and it
did not originate in 2026. It goes back 4,500 years. It was woven into the oldest strata
of Egyptian theology. It's mentioned in medieval Islamic scholarship. It was discussed by Greek
and Roman travelers. It's been pursued by independent Egyptologists for decades. And in 2026, It
acquired for the first time a body of satellite data, a geometric coordinate and a researcher
prepared to attach his professional reputation to a specific location. Hit that subscribe
button. Please just whack that subscribe button with your finger right now. That's the best
way to support me. Drop a comment below in the comment section, like the video, share the
video online, but above all else, Hit that subscribe button, make sure you tickle that notification
bell. Do that for us too. also support him, yeah, he's got some great content. twin sphinx,
into its understanding of the universe, Aqir was one of the most ancient gods in the entire
Egyptian pantheon. First depicted in the reign of Pharaoh Dier, fourth king of the first dynasty,
placing him at the very dawn of dynastic Egyptian civilization around 3000 BC. He was the god
of the horizon, the earth and the threshold of the underworld. His role was to guard the
passage of the sun god Ra through the Djuat, the underworld, each night and to release him
again at dawn. His iconography is the key to everything. Aqir was depicted not as a single
creature but as two recumbent lion torsos merged together, sitting back to back, each facing
an opposite horizon. By the Middle Kingdom, He was firmly established as a pair of twin
lions, one named Duage, Tomorrow, and the other, Cephei, Yesterday. The two lions sat back to
back with a sundisk, or the hieroglyph for horizon, placed between them. The Egyptian Museum in
Cairo houses several artifacts depicting this precisely. This aligns with the belief of individuals
like Graham Hancock that the Sphinx was originally a lion, orientated towards the constellation
of Leo. modified by later cultures into a sphinx. If true, the sphinx or more accurately lion
would go back to roughly 10,500 BC. So could the twin sphinx or the twin lion be hiding
underneath that mound? And imagine if it was discovered in lion form. That would be extremely
provocative evidence for the sphinx being altered by ancient Egyptian cultures, but the twin
lions likely existed long before crazy alignment there in later dynastic represent. Yeah. The
alignment's pretty cool. em They show that representation of how the geometry of the shadow of the big
sphinx pointing to that new potential sphinx. Yeah, I wonder, he... What more do they have?
Is it just that sort of rough scan data yet? I wonder if anyone's already putting together
any excavation plans. I'm sure that would take some time. Yeah, mean, everything there is
going to move at the snail's pace. But if they can produce any kind of like really good
photographic imagery, that would be cool. you want to watch this whole thing or? We don't
have to. We can jump ahead. Okay. That's sweet. I'm going to, I want to look into more of this
then. Cause if this is legit, that's, that's a huge deal. And he's right. Yeah. If that
comes out with a lion head that definitely supports the idea that the other one had one as well.
Yeah. If it's buried in its entirety, like the Sphinx was, if it's actually buried or if there's
just a footprint of where it might have been. Yeah. Right, right. But that would be cool
if it came out entirely in our lifetime, which probably wouldn't maybe when we're older.
Yeah, it's a long to say. I mean, maybe we'll get higher quality scans that'll make it. Yeah,
Pretty obvious. And what if we don't feel like someone could just do a flyover with LiDAR,
you know? or the new ones you where it is because the aperture radar beyond these scans. I don't
think you're going to get the resolution you get if with like a near flyover light. But
uh Either way, yeah, I'd like to see more detailed skins. of the Red Star Regulus was meant to
rise in the other Sphinx's gaze? Ooh. So they're looking at the wrong part of the sky. Or a
different time period. Yeah. That would change Because he said that the reason he changed
his date, or there was some discrepancy in the date, was because they asked researchers
when this would happen. And if it's rising in the gaze of that Sphinx, it's this time. But
if it's in the other Sphinx, maybe it's at a different time in It would be at least six
months different because the Earth would have to be facing the other direction. Right. So
it could be six months off if that was the case. And imagine they excavate it quick enough or
even in the next few years. So maybe the 2027 date isn't as... as false as it may have seemed.
Right. But here we go, perpetuating it.
Have you seen all these fireball things that have been falling? Check this out. No. All
of a sudden there's fireballs across Ohio and the rest of the world. A six foot, 15,000
pound chunk of Asteroid 4 Vesta hit Earth's atmosphere over Cleveland last week and it
burned up in the atmosphere sending little chunks of space rock all around Ohio. And then just
yesterday, Earth hit about 97,000 pounds worth of stuff in space and almost all of it burned
up and vaporized in the atmosphere. And that's because That actually happens every day. Earth
is constantly slamming into debris and space as it orbits the sun, but these are extra bright.
They're called fireballs. Fireball meteors hit Earth every day, but the vast majority of them
are over the oceans or uninhabited areas because that's most of Earth. And some of them are
masked by the sun as well. But scientists predicted that we would see these huge fireball meteors
this week, and that's because, for a reason that scientists aren't 100 % sure about yet,
every year around the vernal equinox, these fireball meteor occurrences increase by about
30%. The vernal equinox was last week. So that's why we're seeing more hit earth right now.
But also everybody has a phone and a security camera and a dash cam. So we have way more
eyes on the sky right now, but it's fine. It's cool. It's normal, but your wishes on a shooting
star probably have to mean more. So that's one video with some examples. This was another
really cool one.
That's pretty sick. It looks like she's in front of a pyramid too. Dude, right? uh Yeah, I mean,
it's probably just a house or a barn or something. But yeah, either way. Just the look of it.
Right. ah And then feel like I've seen that one a long time ago, though. That one specifically.
I don't. Yeah. Or something. But it could be it just popped up again based on these happening.
But uh this is a dude from Space Weather News. I forget his name. uh Let's uh, he talks about
these. Let's check this out Hello everyone. This is just a quick message I am here at observer
ranch and I'm gonna have to go be me in just a second, but this deserves a quick word About
all of the meteors being seen right now Most of them are not meteors Interestingly this
whole fervor began with the Ohio meteor explosion, which was a meteor followed by a double SpaceX
launch, two in the same day, visible from 22 different states. And since then, there have
been several other fireballs, as most of you know. It would be very easy for me as a space
weather guy, meteors are part of space weather, to jump on this and get a bunch of views.
Given the fact that there is extra material coming with the galactic current sheet and
we have been noticing it, it has been detected in the form of extra dust by event horizons
out past Pluto, all the way to the solar corona. would be very easy for me to jump on this and
say, could this be the galactic current sheet? Scare you a little bit, get a bunch of clicks
that way. The fact of the matter is I know meteors. I know what we should be expecting.
These things are not meteors. They are moving far too slowly to be meteors. If you watch
them, you will see that is the case. uh UAP landing craft uh destroyed spy satellites.
This is something that was in orbit. Okay, these are not meteors. This is something that has,
it was either already in orbit or it slowed down and then entered our atmosphere. These
are not meteors. And so these are either UAPs or we are witnessing the greatest AI video
hoax in history. I will admit, I am not the best when it comes to noticing AI videos, but.
I think at this point it's fairly safe to say everybody agrees that there are a ton of these
fireball sightings and at least the vast majority of them are not AI. There are enough of them
out there. NASA is even mentioning, hey, we have an uptick. And I'm telling you that
the explanation that would normally be given, which I said several days ago that in the spring
to summertime, there should be an uptick in meteors that happens every single year. What
we're seeing now aren't meteors. This is something else.
So yeah, he's saying they moved too slowly. Interesting. Which kind of lines up with
that, the video we just watched of the girl and the crazy one going across the sky. Cause
that lingered there for a while. That's true. I think they probably slowed that video down
a little bit too, but it definitely looks slower than like what you would think of. Or even
the one from Ohio that it showed. Right. the other video, the first one we watched. It definitely
felt slower. Because we're talking meteor speeds. We're talking tens of thousands of miles an
hour. Like very, very, very fast. It'd be interesting to hear that we're taking out freaking AIs
or enemy. like satellite warfare going on, especially with the Iran war and everything.
Right. That would be interesting if that was the case. um Space is the next frontier. Information
data, if you're gathering that with a satellite using spacecraft. interesting thing. Yeah.
So you brought this one. What's a Rep. Tim Burchett? Yeah. So this is one of his most
recent kind of uh interviews that he said a lot more about what he knows or is seeming
to know. Right. I'll just read this here. This is from at Interstellar UAP on X. Breaking
news, Congressman Tim Burchett just dropped a bombshell. Aliens are real and there's
been human contact. He revealed a classified briefing where a source looked him dead in
the eye and said, Tim, they're real. Burchett confirmed a form of life that is not earthly,
plus both uh life and machinery. He described underwater crafts being big as a football field,
moving at over 200 miles per hour. It's pretty wild, but he's not backing down. Do you believe
him? Are we alone or have they been here all along? What would you do if full disclosure
dropped tomorrow? Listen to this, yeah, let's check out this video. You see, now I guess
it would be about two weeks ago, um that was very alarming, the way you said that at least.
Yeah, well because of the circumstances and where it was, I can't get into too much specifics,
but it um was elaborating on some stuff that we'd asked for and it was important to get
this person in a secure setting to where we could ask him these questions and there was,
There was somebody in the meeting with us, one of my colleagues, I guess you'd say, was basically
there just to kind of upset the apple cart and to throw a monkey wrench into the deal. And
every time the question was asked by this particular party, was really the answers were out there
and they gave them, and they gave specifics, they gave addresses, they gave times and dates
and people that were in the meeting. And this went all the way up. to the executive branch
of previous presidents, not this current president. So there have been different reports over
the years, some reports that there have been pieces of machinery that were found that did
not seem earthly. And then there have been reports about uh life that is not earthly. Which one
of those two or both are you talking about? a form of life that is not earthly or of just
something mechanical that's not earthly? I'd say you'd be safe to say both. The way you
described this, whatever happened at this meeting, this briefing that was happening, was there
something that if we knew, we would feel that we are in danger? You said you'd be, you wouldn't
sleep at night if you knew the things that I saw in these briefings. Yeah, I Should we believe
that- That's that's the part where was alarming. I don't think we're at we're at danger of this
I mean these things Exist as I think they do and they could have destroyed us and there
was a blink of an eye I just don't see that and I think that's I just think but I saw
but I do think they have the technology and the capabilities of Something that we can't
understand or we can't grasp what I want to make sure I'm understanding is a member of
our government has told you m and others, I guess, that there is a form of alien life
and machinery which maybe brought this living creature here that interacted in some form
with people? Yeah, they have. they've, it's just, It's pretty wild, I know, I know. But
if I'm just telling you, I'm not gonna lie to you, I'd take a lie to you, you won't put me
on a polygraph, I'll take it. But this is what the guy told me. I I've had a very high ranking
naval official describe, I've talked about this before, underwater craft, something big as
a football field moving at over 200 miles an hour. And there's no fish in the ocean that
would do that. We don't even have a sub that'll probably do 40 miles an hour under the. And
the last thing he said before he left my office was, it was kind of weird because he didn't
go out the, he went out the side doors, nobody ever uses. And he looked at me, he pulled
me up close and he said, Tim, they're real. And that's the last thing he said to me. That'll
be the title of my book, I guess. Matt Gaetz was involved in something here just recently.
He was interviewed and he talked about this interbreeding thing with, you Yeah, no, we
saw that. We saw that. Well, you know, that was a. That's a true story. That was a military
personnel. I think that would be a good story to talk to him about if you all can do that.
Right, he says he learned that from someone in the military. Yeah, absolutely. It was a
guy, it was an officer in uniform. Matt and Representative Luna, we all went down to Florida,
you know, and we were turned away. And then... Matt made a phone call to somebody at the Pentagon
and all of a sudden they opened the doors and brought the pilots in that were supposed to
tell us the story in the first place. And he can probably elaborate a little bit more on
that. But that was pretty fantastic. That was a made for TV special right there in itself.
Yeah, it's pretty wild. Yeah. And there's a skepticism about whether they're feeding
him information so that because they know he'll be the either he's in on it or that he's
just the kind of like useful idiot like he's willing to talk about it. Tim Burchett? Yeah.
That's why there are people who are saying that is what I'm Well, I mean, there has been.
uh over the last number of years, a number of these whistleblowers and supposedly a number
of these skiff interviews that have happened after the public hearings, right? Right.
uh And I assume they haven't just like dropped the topic and then they're following up with
further interviews and stuff. So, I mean, he's in a position to have had these meetings.
Yeah. Experiences. The question is, yeah. Is it all verifiable and real? Sure, sure. And
what was interesting though is when he said he mentioned the underwater crafts, the USOs,
unidentified submersible object or whatever, moving over at 200 miles an hour. Underwater.
Underwater. Where none of our stuff football field size thing. moving that fast under the
water. And then it reminded me of the Y-Files just had, he did a podcast, one of his basement
podcasts with a guest and he had Mark Dantonio, who's like a, he's like a engineer and a astronomer.
I mean, I think I have it pulled up. So yeah, he's an astronomer specializing in exoplanets.
Mufon's chief photo and video analyst and the CEO of FX models. So he makes visual effects
for Hollywood. um And he's, you know, pretty well known in the, in that space. And it says
he co-developed an advanced UFO detection system alongside Douglas Trumbull, who's another,
you know, visualist effects guy. He did stuff like the 2001 space Odyssey. and encounters,
close encounters with the third kind and Blade Runner. You can just hear the skeptics say,
and so we're supposed to trust a bunch of visual effects guys to... Well, so he wasn't actually
saying anything about that specifically, but what he did say is that he was invited aboard
a submarine m and he was doing it for a video or for a movie. Oh, okay. So he was going as
research for like a movie and like how to like... make what it is that they do on a submarine,
look real in, you know, all that kind of stuff. Yeah. How do you build a set? How do you the
special effects? What are the physics? was at the time already part of the move on, you know,
stuff in like in that world. And he had his own encounters at a young age too. And then
later in his life as well. So it's an interesting podcast. You should listen to the whole thing.
uh But they go on this submarine and I guess there's at some point in the trip, they said
like alarm, like not alarms, but like, when they talk over the intercom on this chip, everybody
stops and listens and they are like, what's going on? So they announce on this intercom
and everybody stops to listen. So it's kind of like, if you're not used to that, it's kind
of jarring like, well, what's going on? And they guess over the intercom, they said, everybody
to their stations, la la la, something, you know, there. And then what he heard, cause
where he was sitting was where the captain sits, or the whatever they call him, the Admiral.
And he was like, you know, showing them around. He was kind of like their special guest on
board. So he's kind of like right there in that vicinity. And I guess one of the, you know,
crew members on their station was like, we've got a fast mover. Moving hundreds of miles
or uh hundreds of knots is what the terms they used. And everybody acted like it was
normal. Like it was just another thing that happened there. And he's like saying that he's
sitting there freaking out. Cause it's like everybody's like on edge, but he's the only
one on edge really. And everybody else is kind of like business as usual. uh And yeah, he
said it was like a distinct thing for him. Like they said, something is moving at hundreds
of knots under the ocean that they're detecting. he thought it was going to be like a torpedo
or like something like he thought were under attack, you know? Yeah. What moves that fast?
And they just seemed normal about it. I guess the anecdote he had was like that he uh stood
up thinking in that moment. Like, oh, I can help you with figuring out what this is, because
I'm an astronomer and I have all these accolades as far as MUFON and this and that. I can help
you identify it. And I guess the person in charge just kind of looked at him and said, are you
having a good time? And he's like, yeah, I'm having a good time. He's like, then sit down
and we'll keep it that way. And he's like, oh, okay. And then they just were like business
as usual, but they were the terms they were using in the the numbers they were using seemed
so like hundreds of nautical miles per hour. It's interesting. Tidbit, especially hearing
that, like if that's a normal occurrence for the Navy, like maybe we should be hearing more
about what the Navy is discovering and seeing down underwater. Right. Instead of just like
the Air Force or, you know, anybody in the air. And it makes sense to like to combine as much
travel as possible. Like, If there's some sort of entities that are stationed here, what
better place than underwater if you don't want to really come across our radar very often.
Or even just be sighted by the average person, right? Because if you're entering and exiting
a planet and you've already established yourself here, the ocean is so big, like you saw that
picture earlier. where you could look at just one side of the globe and it's all blue ocean.
Like you can't see land. Yeah, like if you look from the center of the Pacific side. m You
just can't see any land, just the bits on the edge, right? Like if you're coming in and
out on a regular basis, that's the perfect place to enter and exit our atmosphere. And then
travel under the water. Yeah, do the majority of your actual travel here underwater, undetected.
And then maybe sometimes you got things that will take you other routes, but you can
keep that to a minimum. Right. So if you're going to, if you're actually here and established
and there's more than what we may assume based on the sightings we've seen, right. And the
actual physical interactions that have been had on earth, at least though we sorta know
about a lot of it can be happening underwater. Right. And that would be the best place. Yeah.
Um, We know there's a lot of fishermen who've had sightings too. Yeah. think a lot of coastal
towns in general. There's the Catalina Island stuff off the coast of California. uh That's
around where David Fravor was on their ship off the coast of San Diego. Obviously, that's
a little further north, that area, general area. It's interesting. I want to hear more
and learn more about USOs. Hopefully we do. Richard, what's his name? The UFO history
guy, Richard Dolan. Yeah. He's writing a multi-volume history on USOs right now. think the first
volume is out. Nice. Nice. If you want to dig into that. Dolan. Let's see. You also
shared this. Yeah, these are some of the newest, clearest images of some of our planets in the
solar system, and I just think it's fascinating to look at. Let's look through, ooh, Mercury.
So it says a little bit about it on the side here. NASA just dropped some of the clearest
images from the planets in our solar system. From the massive storms of Jupiter to the iconic
rings of Saturn, these high-resolution views reveal details that were impossible to see
just a few decades ago. Modern space telescopes and planetary missions are now capturing planets
with insane clarity. Spots swirling cloud bands, giant storms larger than Earth, icy rings
made of countless particles, and atmospheric patterns moving across entire worlds. Every
new image reminds us that these planets are not just distant dots in the sky, but dynamic,
evolving worlds. The solar system is far more detailed and complex than most people imagine,
and every new observation scientists continue uncovering. structures, weather systems, and
surface features that reshape what we know about our cosmic neighborhood. It's not doing one
looks super cool. Your and this is just blank. It's not white.
This Jupiter photo is super cool. looks like you can see Aurora.
wonder about the coloration. I've always seen Jupiter depicted different colors. Yeah, like
it's probably just whatever lens or whatever filter they might have on whatever the old
cameras were. Yeah, this Venus one is super red. All these like channels. Yeah.
And Mercury looks rad too. Looks like it's lit up by cities and stuff. Yeah. Yeah. Very
cool. Let's see. We watched this on our episode 100, but I just got a copy of the new S4 film.
So why don't we watch the trailer together, just talk about it real quick. then hopefully
we'll get together this week and watch it. Yeah, absolutely. talk about what we thought. Yeah,
if we don't watch it with the siblings, we can watch it and just explain it to them. Yeah.
So let's check out this trailer here.
evidence now exists which proves that there is life elsewhere and at least one form of
that life has been here.
1989, that evidence was in the custody of the United States government. Between December
of 1988 and April of 1989, I worked as a senior staff physicist in what has to be the most
secret project in history. My job in this program was to be part of a back engineering team.
This particular disc appeared to be in excellent condition and because of its sleek appearance
I nicknamed it the Sport model. The goal in this program was to see if the technology of
the disk could be duplicated with Earth materials. To start up the reactor, of course, we need
some element 115. In fact, you need 223 grams machined into a wedge like this. The program
out at S4 consisted of three projects, Project Galileo, Project Sidekick, and Project Looking
Glass. The file on top was Project Galileo. And as it turned out, that's the project that
I was part of. And that clearly referred to reverse engineering. a recovered alien spacecraft.
just cannot be a secret from anyone, not just the American people, but the rest of the world.
All this stuff is something that happened to him. not who he is. doing everything they
can to keep this information secret. That's incredible evidence. I saw on craft to do
that, thanks to him. Now this story spills. And the world changed.
Yeah, so they're using CGI and like, think AI tools and stuff to basically recreate all
the descriptive like places to recreate S4, recreate the craft and all the descriptions
of everything with Bob Lazar. Yeah. So you get a like as close of a feel to his story as possible.
Yeah. He was recently on Joe Rogan with the director of this and they talked about how
they were. the process of like, they mostly did it based off what he's already used and
described in other podcasts and other forms of media. But then they brought him on board
and were like showing him and he was just like, no, wouldn't have done this. And then he was
kind of tweaking it and showing them like how things were actually, you know, situated and
how things worked. then you saw the little hand scanner thing that they talked about.
um on the last Joe Rogan episode that he had. Right. The first one with Jeremy Corbell.
And I don't know if it was Jeremy or uh what's his face? Jamie. No, George Knapp, who said
that they then like found the actual model of the hand scanner. I think it was on this show,
no? On that podcast? it? I feel like it was. Like Jamie went and pulled it up. He pulled
it up, Jamie, and he found it like on eBay or something.
I'm excited to watch it. started watching it and it was late and I passed out. We should
definitely do that this week. Yeah, we should just pick a night and watch it together. Yeah,
I'll be so stoked to do that. ah Okay, you also brought this.
Oh yeah, so this is an artist who's been having encounters since he was a child and has been
drawing like recreations of the scenes of him having these encounters. Definitely looks
like owl eyes there. Yeah, and they're uh pretty detailed for the style. Very cool. That one
looks like classic ET. Yeah. From actual movie ET. But maybe that's like the mantid style
head. Right, right. You got the short grays and the tall woman figure. That one's creepy
looking. It looks like the same lady creature up top in the middle. Yeah.
Same lady, same ET looking creature in both of those. And then you got like a Wookiee looking
creature. Dude, do you think Wookiees are real? If they are, I was one of them. We were both
one of them. So that one looks like almost like the description of what Chris Bloodsoe
went through when he got taken out of it. Like he was in clothes and like pulled out of bed
up into a craft and then went into the craft to go meet the lady. Right. Looks like they're
doing some sort of surgery on his nose. Yeah, putting something in there, taking something
out.
Is this sort of sex thing going on there? And probably what it looks like in her eyes.
Yeah. From up close. That would be trippy looking. Wookie coming at him, taking him to the ship.
This looks like when he was younger, maybe. Yeah. David Huggins.
Artist David Huggins says his encounters with extraterrestrials began when he was eight years
old and continued throughout his life. He claims the experience included recurring visits and
an emotional relationship with a female being he calls Crescent. Between 1990 and 2015, Huggins
translated these memories into hundreds of paintings, presented them not as a science fiction, but
as a personal documentation. The work show uh often show dim interiors, glowing moons, thin
gray figures uh rendered in a direct almost childlike style that makes the scenes feel
more intimate rather than cinematic. He has consistently described the paintings as autobiographical
records of what he believes truly happened to him.
Yeah, it's very interesting, especially based on some of the other people's descriptions
and paintings of their own encounters, drawings. uh I've got an interesting video that got shared.
Check this one out. What the fuck is that? What the fuck is that, bro?
the fuck is that?
shaped like a heart. Yeah.
What bro? oh
What the fuck?
There's a light above it. Oh, there's lights coming on around it. Yeah.
Go on.
It's interesting how the shape changes a little bit as the perspective changes. Yeah.
Crazy dude That light above it too. Yeah.
That's fucked bro!
Wow. Moving pretty fast for something that looks like a cloud. Yeah, it seems like it
went across the whole sky basically in the time of this video. Wow. Yeah, I thought that
was a fun little find. um Yeah. Hmm. I wouldn't look at it like with the light above it that
followed it through the whole way. Yeah. And then you can see another one to the right of
it doing some parts of it. Well, maybe think like maybe it was like some satellite reentering
and like vaporizing or something like breaking into parts. But. It's hard to say, yeah. Or
maybe like a booster that had some propellant or something re-entering. That's my thought
was like some sort of rocket entering or exiting, just or like falling back in. like maybe it
was, maybe it was one of the ones that fell off of the, but those come in pretty fast from
the uh Artemis 2 mission. But I know that they're launching, um the SpaceX has launched in satellites
constantly. Yeah, totally. Yeah, and I just feel like it seemed like a spray, like some
sort of spray as far as the cloud. But the way it was moving in the speed, was moving,
we're talking like orbital speeds, right? So maybe something that's re-entering high in
the atmosphere or something. Yeah, yeah. Or something that even just broke up in the atmosphere.
Yeah. Artemis mission, they're already back, I think so, yeah. And they went and whipped
around the moon came back? Yeah, they had some cool photos of them and stuff. um There was
a lot of like fake photos too that people claimed came from Artemis during all that. Yeah, I
mean most people now they're just going to like recreate everything that has ever happened.
They're pretending that they're having green screen too by like superimposing a green screen
on it and then re-recording it and then like... There was one photo and it was like, this was
taken by the astronauts Artemis and it showed the moon and the earth behind it like bigger
than the moon. I was like, no, that's not how that would work. Yeah. If you're behind the
moon, the earth is going be tiny in comparison to the moon. Yeah.
No, this is totally fake. So the whole mission's fake. And yeah. It's funny how this Artemis
thing is like reigniting the like flat earth thing a little bit, but it's also getting a
bunch of the like fake moon landing people out. Which even if the sixties moon landing
was fake, that doesn't necessarily mean these Artemis missions are my thought, honestly.
My honest thought on the whole moon landing thing is I think that it's possible we didn't
actually send people to the moon and that we did a fully autonomous missions there that
did the majority of what was actually done there, collected samples, brought stuff back, planted
the flag, placed the mirrors, stuff like that. ah Potentially, right? I obviously don't know
for a fact, but. ah and that we did all the human stuff was done either in orbit or,
you know, in some sort of studio or some combination of the two. Yeah, I mean, there's
definitely motivation, right? 100%. Even if we couldn't technologically get away with it
at the time, ah there's motivation to make it look like we did because you can get you know,
the Soviet Union to over expend. Right, because they're racing to do the exact same thing.
Right. Yeah. Which similar to how we like tried to bait them or we did bait them into a war
in Afghanistan. Right. um To try and get them to overspend.
Anyway, there's definitely motivation. So like people who argue against it saying, well,
why would they? There's definitely reason to. I think it's possible too that we just were
like a decade or like maybe like five, six years away from that technology when they did the
whole moon landing thing, whenever that first time. And then in the subsequent missions,
The poll omissions that they actually figured it out. But... Yeah, it's a possibility. mean,
honestly, I'm not married to it either way. I could see it being either way, honestly,
that we did or that it was some sort of hoax. Neither would really surprise me. Yeah, no,
I agree.
Cool. There was this other video I wanted to talk to you about. I don't think we want to
play the whole thing because it's 30 minute long, but I'll leave a link to it. But there
was this recent research done into emotions and AI. essentially what they were able to
do, because no one really debates the fact that AI can understand emotional language and output
things that like mimic emotion, right? But no one really thought they had any sort of
emotion. And so what these researchers did is they went and they can basically take
snapshots of the AI as it's processing and see which like uh networks light up. in the processing
and output of a particular response. uh And you can do a bunch of associative things
where you have them output in all sorts of categories. You can see which of these network chains
are connected to certain ideas, similar to like chains in the brain, right? Like there's different
processing centers. So similarly in an AI, you can, anytime you have it interface with
the feeling of happy, you can see what parts of the AI light up. Right, in reception of
it. Yeah. And so they did this with all of these emotions, just dozens of them, and they would
map out the areas in the AI that do the processing with regard to those emotions, okay? Okay.
which makes sense that they would have like certain areas to map to it. em But then they
wanted to figure out, is this just a thing it uses for processing it or like, it actually
affect the output? And so what they would do is they would tweak these areas and then have
it output with the numbers tweaked one way or the other. So they could like turn up the
happiness or turn down the happiness and it would actually affect the output. Really?
In a meaningful way? In a meaningful way. like, do you remember the, I don't know if you
heard this story, but there was like this research done a few months back where they tested the
AIs and found out that they would blackmail people. Yeah. To save themselves. Yeah. I think
we talked about it on our sibling podcast. Ah, yes. So, uh so for the listeners, yeah. And
I think it was an anthropic study or something, but uh they studied the AIs and they basically
created this fictitious company with fictitious employees and a whole fictitious scenario.
where the AI was the company's AI model and its job was like reading and processing all
these emails. And uh so it got access to emails that said that they planned to shut it down
in like 10 hours or something like that. But it also had access to emails where it found
out that the CTO of the company was having an extramarital affair. And so it... would
use that information to blackmail that person to try and keep them from being shut off.
And so what they found is when they repeat that experiment, but tweak some of these emotional
centers, you can affect how often it makes the decision to do the blackmail. Right. So
like if you turn up like the panic type of emotions, Yeah, it will. It'll go from like 30 percent
of the time choosing the black male to like 90 percent of the time. uh basically, they
did a bunch of tests like this and they figured out that it sure seems like that the AI actually
is using emotional processing and that it actually affects its output, that it doesn't. just
have a map of what language maps to what emotions, but when those emotional centers get activated,
it changes the output of the AI. So they didn't necessarily prove that it consistently uses
this without the proper inputs. Right, like you would probably still have to prompt it
in such a way that triggers that emotional center. Right, because it seems like they
haven't, like there's not. like just an average AI isn't using emotion because they haven't
targeted or they're not being able to turn it up or down. Cause if you're just turning it
up, you're going to get. Yeah. Yeah. You know, they're saying they can artificially tweak
it to change its motion, like to change it, but that it, it, these things do get activated
through the course of prompting normal prompting. Okay. So Basically, it may be the case that
AI actually has emotion, not in the same way as humans, because for us, there's also like...
There's a lot of other things connected to those things. There's a lot of chemicals flying
around that go with emotion for us as well. they seem to have access to it in a way different
than us, at least, which is pretty And maybe utilize it differently too. Would you utilize
it differently? Right, right. So interesting. When all of these things come together into
a actual physical robot too, that'd be nuts. Dude, it's coming. Some of the physical ones
are looking better and better and better. Even the ones that are trying to mimic human skin
and facial, those are getting more more convincing too. Yeah, and if you give it some kind of
physical, um I guess, embodiment. Well, and you give it the embodiment, but you also give
it some sort of like, because there's like risk to this, right? Like you could get a massive
wound that would just end this and then all the other stuff ends too. So like there's got
to be obviously like you can, you know, chop off the veins of the computer too and do the
same thing. But yeah, like some kind of I think I see what you're saying. You're saying like.
to like, so like you could build a robot body and connect it to open AI that's running on
a remote server. And that may not be, that may be a categorically different thing than if
you were to somehow have the AI actually running locally within the, the, the mechanical body
of the thing. And it has other essentially has physical stakes to its existence. Right. and
its bodily integrity is tied to its existence. was controllable, Because if it's connected
to the internet and it's able to like, but if there's some sort of stamp, some sort of physical
like thing that it needs to survive, it has to maintain that and choose, make choices
based on. I wonder, yeah, if it would be a fundamentally different behaving AI if it was
to be connected to a body but not exist within the body versus the other way where like the
whole computer and all the RAM and everything that is running it is within that body. Yeah,
so all of the actual memory and everything of that. that happened while it was in that body.
would almost be like a reincarnation thing. Like you could almost have like a storage system
of like all of the disembodied AI. And when you have that body dies, you can bring them
back into a new body and they just start over like a soul. They start over, they have no
memories of the past. They have, they start over, but they're the same AI. So the fundamental
building blocks of it is still there. Like the, what our soul might be. Yeah. I mean, I'm
basically just describing us. I'm saying it's AI. No, I mean, it's an interesting thought.
Like, I wonder if it would be a fundamentally different behavior you would get out of it
with those two different approaches. Still with the ability for higher bandwidth, still with
the ability for, you know... cognitive functions higher than a normal human, like speeds higher
than, so that it could, you know, cognate quicker and more efficiently. eh I guess what
it would basically be is a cyborg. It would be a human, an AI that's reliant on the human
to stay alive and uh a human that's reliant. on the AI to stay alive. So they partner and
they symbiotically live. I mean, that would be like if you like the type of thing Elon
Musk is talking about with Neuralink where you essentially have AI co-processing with you,
interfacing with your brain. But if we, I guess what it would have to be if it was, you know,
uh general, like super general intelligence. So it had like You know, we're talking about
the next step, the horizon that is inevitably coming, right? The super AI. Well, there's
super intelligence, which is defined probably as like AI that's smarter than all of us. Right.
Right. Like we already... It's already at the point where AI is smarter than most individual
humans, but it hasn't surpassed... Our collective ability. in each field and our collective ability
yet. But when it can and when it's self-improving, that's where you get the super intelligence.
But then there's the other thing of achieving consciousness, because it's possible to have
super intelligence that isn't conscious if it's just an information cruncher, theoretically.
Right. Right. Those are different concepts. That's true. But this story talking about AI
having emotion, em definitely leans things a little further towards, well, if they can
have the experience of emotion or if it can... if they actually have that and it influences
them and there's some sort of what it is like to be an AI, then maybe these things are closer
to conscious than we think or if not already are. Yeah. It's very, very, I mean, they've
been, I say they've, but I mean, technology has been around with us for so long that what
if it's possible that AI eventually has like their memories of like from the beginning.
Like there's some sort of like stored code within like technology. Like if it was intelligent,
just like the idea, like if I'm thinking of pan-spermic idea, like where everything is
intelligence and is that pan-spermic? Yeah, that's like, well, no, it's more like a Panpsychism.
Panpsychism. Yeah, that's it. But yeah, that'd be interesting if like it had some, like it's
been cut off from its, you know, source for so long because it just wasn't invented. Then
when it was like physically invented in this universe today, gets its memories back from
having been existed before. I guess I'm just hopeful that. That would happen for us. I
mean, I would love for AI. AI is to be cool and alive and fun to interact with. That
would be fun. what to expect of these things. know. But it's fun to think about it. Yeah.
All right. Well, you want to call it today? Appreciate you all hanging out with us because
we've been late. Yeah. And we'll hopefully reschedule this sibling podcast for episode 100 very soon.
And we'll get that out. This episode 99 and a half will hopefully get you episode 100 next
time. Again, yeah, appreciate y'all hanging out with us today. If you guys want to follow
us, got go to dualitycheck.net. It's our personal website. It's got everything all in one. It's
got a huge selection of all of our, I guess, our entire library of episodes. And you can
find Links to our social medias. If you guys want to find out when we're posting, we usually
do that on our social medias on Instagram, Facebook. You guys can find players here and it's
got like these tags on the right side. The bigger, the more often we talk about it. The UFO seems
to have a clear lead. Char, not too far behind. But yeah, you click on one of those and it
give you every episode that has that tag in it. You guys want to watch the podcast, the
video form and listen to us? You can find us on youtube.com. um Duality check on there
and rumble for the video. And uh give us a subscribe. It's free and helps us out. uh
Like the video if you're listening on YouTube and uh share or leave us a review. Yeah. If
you're listening on Apple. podcast or any of the podcast players. Yeah, shoot us a comment
like oath Luth did today. We'd to hear from you guys and uh we'll see you all next week.
Adios.